Majority of MacManus's article is evidence, providing a long list of debated
questions with Clinton’s responses. When I read the questions that MacManus choose,
there was really not enough questions on her own plans, as in about
ISIS, Putin, and or Benghazi. From the highlights of the answers that Clinton
provided being a women with experience and progressive. Sure there was a question about her
opinion about Bernie Sander’s idea for banks, but it wasn’t appealing to me
about her short response. Where is this triumph that the press is talking about?
In fact, MacManus does provide his own commentary about Bernie Sanders, another well-known Democratic Runner. My first assumption was that he was using Bernie’s points to compare to Clintons, but it was just Bernie’s commentary that I saw a poor use of evidence.
I think that whoever saw
the debate could bias about who was truly the winner depending on what side
they are on. All over you see the press point that Hillary Clinton was the
winner but there are some online public opinion polls that state otherwise.
So my opinion didn’t change on who I thought who won the debate, and
this is coming from someone who is not even a Democrat supporter.
“Was the audience
applauding Sanders, Clinton or both? It's hard to say.” – Doyle MacMancus.
No comments:
Post a Comment